2024年雅思写作预测大题库限时免费领取，想要领取的同学可以戳：
2024年雅思写作预测大题库&范文领取！你将遇到的99%纸笔/机考考题都在其中！
学习说明 ✦
雅思情报圈
欢迎加入雅思写作学习中~在开始学习前有几点需要提醒：
1.雅思情报圈更新的考题都是目前在雅思考试中会考到的题目，也就是说，只要你认真跟着学习，在考场上就能遇到原题。
2. 截止到目前我们一共更新了700多道写作原题解析和范文，可以说是目前市面上最全的题库和范文解析了。如果你想查看之前的内容，可以关注我们，在历史发布推文中查看。之后我们也会继续更新。
3. 如果你有足够强的基础和自学能力，我相信情报圈的范文解析就能帮你有效提分，如果你想要让老师带你系统学习，可以直接联系我们。
情报圈的第747篇写作范文解析
双边类大作文，健康类话题
Some people say governments should give priority to health care, while others believe that taxpayers’ money should be spent on other important priorities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
题目来源：2024年8月24日大陆雅思大作文（重复2015年7月23日大陆考题）
1、题目大意
有人认为政府应该优先考虑卫生保健，而另一些人则认为应该把纳税人的钱花在其他重要的优先事项上。讨论双方观点并给出自己的看法
2、思路解析
这是一道双边类大作文，聊的是政府应该优先投资医疗卫生还是其他项目。双边类大作文，需要对每个观点分别表达同意或反对，最终的结论就是我的立场，可以是中立（双方都同意或都反对），也可以是单边支持某一方立场。
审题时需要注意两点，一是观点句中主语是政府，在讨论时需要从政府角度出发。二是题目中提到了“taxpayers’ money”，因此需要考虑到纳税人的利益问题。下面，王珍老师带大家一起来看下具体观点。
首先来看支持优先发展医疗保健的观点，有两方面。
一是医疗保健是基础需求，关乎每个人的生命与健康，是人们最基本的需求之一。若医疗体系不健全，人民的健康无法得到保障，这不仅会影响社会整体的幸福感，还会导致劳动力的损失，从而阻碍国家的经济发展。
二是政府在医疗保健上投入更多资金，可以有效提高预防性医疗服务的质量和覆盖范围。这有助于减少慢性病和传染病的发生率，降低长远医疗费用的支出。例如，加强对疫苗接种的资助，可以显著减少流行病的暴发，从而减轻未来的财政负担。
再来看另一方的观点，可以从三个角度出发。
一是教育和基础设施建设同样重要。虽然医疗保健很重要，但教育和基础设施建设同样是国家发展的关键。如果政府将大量资源用于医疗保健，可能导致这些领域的资金短缺。
教育对培养高素质劳动力至关重要，而良好的基础设施则是经济发展的支柱，因此政府应在这些领域中合理分配资源，以实现全面发展。
二是政府将更多的资金投入到促进经济发展的项目中，如技术创新、产业升级等，可能会带来更高的经济增长率。经济的繁荣可以带动整体生活水平的提高，包括医疗保健在内的各个方面也会随之受益。因此，优先发展经济可能是更具长远眼光的选择。
三是在一些国家，自然灾害和突发事件频发，因此需要投入大量资金用于应急和灾害管理。如果政府将过多的预算用于医疗保健，可能会导致应急资金不足，从而无法有效应对突发的自然灾害或其他紧急情况。因此，政府应在灾害管理和医疗保健之间进行平衡分配。
3、提纲
4、高分范文示例
In contemporary society, the allocation of government funds remains a subject of heated debate, particularly when it comes to prioritizing health care over other essential public services.
While some argue that the government should focus on improving healthcare systems, others contend that taxpayer money could be better spent on different pressing issues.
In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and argue that a balanced approach, considering the merits of each view, is essential.
Proponents of prioritizing health care argue that a well-funded health care system is fundamental to the well-being of a nation. Health care is a basic human right, and ensuring that all citizens have access to quality medical services can significantly improve overall public health.
By investing in health care, governments can reduce mortality rates, manage chronic diseases more effectively, and promote a healthier population, which in turn enhances economic productivity.
Moreover, in times of crisis, such as pandemics, the strength of a country's healthcare infrastructure can be the difference between life and death for millions. Thus, the argument for prioritizing health care is compelling, as it directly impacts the quality of life and the sustainability of a nation's workforce.
On the other hand, those who advocate for allocating taxpayer money to other priorities suggest that there are equally critical areas that require government attention.
Education, infrastructure, and social welfare programs are vital to the long-term development of a country. For instance, investing in education not only equips individuals with the skills needed to thrive in a competitive job market but also fosters innovation and economic growth.
Similarly, robust infrastructure is essential for efficient transportation, commerce, and the overall functioning of society. Without adequate investment in these areas, a country may face stagnation, inequality, and a decline in its global competitiveness.
Therefore, it is argued that a diversified allocation of resources is necessary to address the multifaceted needs of society.
In conclusion, both health care and other public services such as education and infrastructure are critical to a nation's development and well-being.
Governments should strive to strike a balance in their spending, ensuring that health care systems are robust while also addressing other essential areas that contribute to a nation's overall prosperity. By doing so, they can create a more equitable and sustainable future for all citizens.
5、相关词汇和语法结构
allocation of government funds 政府资金分配
heated debate 激烈的辩论
prioritizing health care 优先考虑医疗保健
essential public services 基本公共服务
well-funded health care system 资金充足的医疗体系
basic human right 基本人权
access to quality medical services 获得优质医疗服务
overall public health 公共健康总体状况
economic productivity 经济生产力
health care infrastructure 医疗基础设施
long-term development 长期发展
competitive job market 竞争激烈的就业市场
fosters innovation 促进创新
economic growth 经济增长
robust infrastructure 强健的基础设施
global competitiveness 全球竞争力
diversified allocation of resources 资源的多元化分配
multifaceted needs of society 社会的多方面需求
equitable and sustainable future 公平和可持续的未来
quality of life 生活质量
【竞赛报名/项目咨询请加微信：mollywei007】
