老师根据考生们的回忆已梳理好12月9日托福考试的考情供大家参考
托福阅读HUAMENGEDU
1)古希腊公园
2)更新世灭绝
3)陨石的爆炸
4)奥尔梅克艺术
5)英国的森林砍伐
6)植物根部重要性
7)海龟孵化的导航策略
8)过去气候的决定因素
9)古澳大利亚大型动物灭绝
10)光谱及其在分析恒星的运用
11)全新的钢铁精炼工艺-贝赛默工艺
12)尼罗河对古埃及王朝社会和文明的重要性
托福听力HUAMENGEDU
Conversation
1)关于学生辅导项目的沟通
2)音乐专业学生计划换专业
3)学生和教授讨论论文难点
4)学生计划研究废弃物助草生长
5)学生去图书馆借书时谈及展会
Lecture
1)细菌噬菌体病毒
2)志愿者绿色政策
3)印象派艺术特点
4)生物侵蚀的机制
5)动物通过声音吸引异性
6)珊瑚礁形成的常见方式
7)讲述一种稳定的碳结构
8)罗塞塔石牌的文字形式
(注: 阅读/听力考试含不同版本且每版主题及题目设置有异.)
托福口语HUAMENGEDU
Task 1
Imagine that you have applied for a job, and the company has invited you to come to their office for an interview. However, the office is located a couple of hours away in another town. Because of the distance, the company has also offered to interview you by phone instead. Which do you choose? Explain why with details in your response.
Task 2
阅读部分:
学校计划将校艺术博物馆从校园内搬迁至市中心. 理由如下:
1)搬迁至更大的地方能够展示更多作品包括学生的项目作品和过去的作品
2)搬迁至市中心能吸引更多来自社区及城市居民的观众从而增加门票收入
听力部分:
女生同意
1)为学生提供更多展示他们项目作品和毕业作品的机会, 提升展示平台和知名度
2)能够增加观众的数量和门票收入, 为学校的艺术院提供更多资金用于购买设备
Task 3
阅读部分:‘Frequency Illusion’
当某个事物或信息首次引起注意后, 在接下来的时间里, 这个事物或信息似乎开始在生活中频繁出现(尽管此前并未引起关注或注意).
听力部分:
教授帮助女儿写了一篇论文后, 开始在电视节目和餐厅中多次遇到与价格相关的艺术作品, 尽管在此之前并未注意到这个主题.
Task 4
植物的防御性适应(‘Plant Defensive Adaptation’)
是指植物在应对食草动物的咬食和破环时采取的各种适应性策略, 以保护自身免受食草者的伤害. 植物通过多种方式来防御食草动物的吃食.
方法1:
有些草种会选择在地面上或生长得很低, 这样食草动物只能吃到植物的上部, 而底部仍能生长出新的草.
方法2:
有的草种会选择在已经死亡的草中间生长, 这些新生长的部分在触及死亡的草时, 便改变了口感或含有化学物质, 让动物不愿食用.
托福写作HUAMENGEDU
A)综合写作
主题: 讲述一种叫‘wicker cactus’的仙人掌是如何从美洲传到非洲的.
阅读部分-提出三种解释
1)鸟类传播: 迁徙之鸟会吃含有该仙人掌种子的水果, 然后将其带至非洲
2)古代陆地连接: 在非洲和美洲大陆分离之前, 这种仙人掌传播到了非洲
3)水手传播: 水手将这种仙人掌带到非洲, 因为可以在船上(没土壤)种植
听力部分-反驳
1)能飞越大洋的鸟类不以这种仙人掌种子为食, 而吃这种仙人掌种子的鸟类却无法迁徙
2)研究表明: 两地区的仙人掌并非来自同一祖先, 所有仙人掌出现在大陆板块分裂之后
3)这种仙人掌如由水手带去, 它们应出现在港口附近; 但它们生长在内陆, 离海岸很远
B)学术讨论
Your professor is teaching a class on Urban Planning. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.
In your response, you should do the following:
- Express and support your opinion.
- Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.
An effective response will contain at least 100 words.
Doctor Achebe:
Traffic congestion during rush hours is a significant issue in urban centers. To mitigate this problem, governments have various solutions aimed at reducing the number of vehicles on the road. One proposed solution involves charging drivers a fee or tax for driving during peak traffic hours. Do you believe this could effectively alleviate traffic congestion? Why or why not?
Andrew:
I believe imposing fees for driving during peak hours might not be the best solution to ease traffic congestion. It could adversely affect business and create economic disadvantages for many individuals. Such charges might burden workers who rely on their cars for commuting, especially those with fixed schedules or limited transportation options.
Claire:
I think charging drivers a fee during peak traffic hours could be a great idea to ease the traffic congestion we face every day. It might encourage more drivers to opt for biking or carpooling, which could significantly benefit the environment and ease overall traffic. For instance, in cities where similar measures have been introduced, there has been a noticeable decrease in the number of vehicles during rush hours.
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
