5.6大陆雅思大作文7分范文及解析：政府投资艺术家

双边类大作文，文化类话题

Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters, musicians and poets. However, other people think that this is a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

题目来源：2023年5月6日大陆雅思大作文

1、题目大意

有些人认为，政府应该为所有类型的艺术家提供帮助，包括画家、音乐家和诗人。然而，另一些人认为这是浪费钱。讨论双方观点并给出你的看法。

2、思路解析

这是一道双边类大作文，聊的是政府资助艺术家是否是浪费钱，双边类大作文，需要对每个观点分别表达同意或反对，最终的结论就是我的立场，可以是中立（双方都同意或都反对），也可以是单边支持某一方立场。审题时注意两点，一是题目限定讨论对象是政府，因此需要考虑到政府及其费用的特性。二是题目提到了艺术家而非单纯的艺术，因此需要考虑到艺术家的特性。下面，月半鸭和大家一起来看下具体观点。

首先来看同意的理由，有两方面。

一是艺术是文化和人们娱乐的重要组成部分，政府资助艺术家有助于保护和传承文化遗产，促进国家的文化发展和对外输出，同时其作品能够丰富人们的精神生活。

二是艺术家的创作通常需要长时间和精力投入，政府的资助可以让艺术家从生活压力中解脱出来，避免受到市场因素的影响，更专注于艺术创作，提高艺术质量和多元化。

然后来看反对的角度，同样可以有三方面。

一是当国家和社会尚且处于贫困阶段时，艺术家并无法解决人们的基本生存需求，政府应当将有限的资金用于医疗、粮食安全、基础建设等更关乎民生的领域。

二是艺术家生存可以依靠市场机制，他们可以通过作品销售、演出、赞助等途径获取收入，其中佼佼者的收入远高于普通人，不必依赖政府资助。

三是政府资助可能导致资源分配不均和浪费，一些不太有实力的艺术家本身应该被淘汰，政府对其资助不仅无法带来回报，还会影响整个艺术行业的健康发展。

3、提纲

5.6大陆雅思大作文7分范文及解析：政府投资艺术家

4、高分范文示例

In today's fast-paced world, the role of government in supporting artists has become a fiercely debated issue. Advocates argue that governments should allocate funds to assist a diverse range of artists, such as painters, musicians, and poets, in order to safeguard cultural heritage and nurture creativity. Conversely, some individuals assert that channeling resources into artistic pursuits is a frivolous use of taxpayers' money. In my view, government assistance for artists is indispensable for the enrichment of society.

First and foremost, by providing financial support for artists, governments empower them to wholly dedicate themselves to their creative pursuits, unencumbered by economic limitations. This cultivates a dynamic cultural landscape, which not only instills national pride but also mirrors the rich tapestry of human emotions and experiences. For instance, the flourishing arts sector in Scandinavian countries, where governments proactively endorse creative industries, has given rise to internationally acclaimed artists and musicians. Additionally, investments in the arts have demonstrated a positive ripple effect on the economy, as cultural activities magnetize tourism and generate employment opportunities.

Nevertheless, detractors of government assistance for artists argue that such funding represents a squandering of public resources. They maintain that in light of urgent concerns such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure development, devoting funds to the arts is an extravagance that societies can ill afford. These critics also contend that market forces should determine the value of art, with accomplished artists deriving income through the sale of their work or performances, rather than relying on government handouts.

In conclusion, although it is undeniable that governments grapple with numerous competing demands on scarce resources, I firmly believe that supporting artists is a judicious investment that yields significant returns for society as a whole. By fostering a diverse and vibrant cultural milieu, governments can stimulate both social cohesion and economic growth. Furthermore, in light of the myriad challenges confronting humanity in the 21st century, the arts possess the unique ability to inspire, provoke, and ultimately elevate the human spirit, rendering their continued support a noble and worthwhile endeavor.

5、相关词汇和语法结构

fiercely debated issue 激烈争论的问题

safeguard cultural heritage 保护文化遗产

nurture creativity 培养创造力

unencumbered by economic limitations 不受经济限制的束缚

dynamic cultural landscape 充满活力的文化景观

rich tapestry of human emotions 丰富的人类情感画卷

internationally acclaimed artists 国际知名的艺术家

positive ripple effect 积极的连锁反应

magnetize tourism 吸引旅游业

generate employment opportunities 创造就业机会

judicious investment 明智的投资